Low-Tech High Efficency Windage Tray
-
- Posts: 7404
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2001 12:01 am
Re: Low-Tech High Efficency Windage Tray
The tuna can makes it very difficult to balance the engine when installing/removing.
Steve
My Baja Build
My Baja Build
- Piledriver
- Moderator
- Posts: 22520
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 12:01 am
Re: Low-Tech High Efficency Windage Tray
Depends on what you are using for an engine lift.Steve Arndt wrote:The tuna can makes it very difficult to balance the engine when installing/removing.
If you are just using a jack, it could suck, but the cans come off in a few seconds.
Some of them use the original sump plate as the bottom, are basically a couple short bits of tubing and a funky bolt.
.
I have been using ATV hoists for engine and trans R&R since they got cheap, I will never use a std jack anymore.
The tuna can could be a feature with those.
Addendum to Newtons first law:
zero vehicles on jackstands, square gets a fresh 090 and 1911, cabby gets a blower.
EZ3.6 Vanagon after that.(mounted, needs everything finished) then Creamsicle.
zero vehicles on jackstands, square gets a fresh 090 and 1911, cabby gets a blower.
EZ3.6 Vanagon after that.(mounted, needs everything finished) then Creamsicle.
-
- Posts: 2433
- Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 1:01 pm
Re: Low-Tech High Efficency Windage Tray
So I've started making cardboard templates but what should I make the final peice from? Aluminium sheet, steel, some sort of plastic, composite ect?
-
- Posts: 1925
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 6:20 am
Re: Low-Tech High Efficency Windage Tray
any material that does not break down under constant contact with engine oils.andy198712 wrote:So I've started making cardboard templates but what should I make the final peice from? Aluminium sheet, steel, some sort of plastic, composite ect?
Composites and plastics would require research.
Alum and steel are known good
- Piledriver
- Moderator
- Posts: 22520
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 12:01 am
Re: Low-Tech High Efficency Windage Tray
Steel is cheap, easy to form and can be welded by most people if need be.
Aluminum not so much. Tends to dislike vibration too.
Aluminum not so much. Tends to dislike vibration too.
Addendum to Newtons first law:
zero vehicles on jackstands, square gets a fresh 090 and 1911, cabby gets a blower.
EZ3.6 Vanagon after that.(mounted, needs everything finished) then Creamsicle.
zero vehicles on jackstands, square gets a fresh 090 and 1911, cabby gets a blower.
EZ3.6 Vanagon after that.(mounted, needs everything finished) then Creamsicle.
-
- Posts: 2433
- Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 1:01 pm
Re: Low-Tech High Efficency Windage Tray
I didn think about stress and vibe cracking....
Thin steel it is, was wondering about fitting heading around the outside of it but more hassle then its worth, KISS!
Will see what I got in the shed and report back
Was going to bolt it to the cam tower with a stubby allen head or bolt to secure it.
Thin steel it is, was wondering about fitting heading around the outside of it but more hassle then its worth, KISS!
Will see what I got in the shed and report back
Was going to bolt it to the cam tower with a stubby allen head or bolt to secure it.
-
- Posts: 2433
- Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 1:01 pm
-
- Posts: 621
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:50 pm
Re: Low-Tech High Efficency Windage Tray
I would recommend buying one as they don't brake the bank, it's not a thing you should be experimenting with if you've not been there and done it, they are just clamped into position by the webbing in the case halves, we used the scat type in BBT CUP motors, some 40 odd race motors used this one, it looks identical to the one shown in FJC's opening post.
http://www.coolairvw.co.uk/Item/Shop_by ... _Tray.html
http://www.coolairvw.co.uk/Item/Shop_by ... _Tray.html
-
- Posts: 2433
- Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 1:01 pm
Re: Low-Tech High Efficency Windage Tray
Do you reccomend them? £15 can't complain!
Cheers
Cheers