Velocity stacks

Who is the best person to rebuild your engine? You...
hemicat
Posts: 167
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 6:24 pm

Velocity stacks

Post by hemicat »

Does anybody know if velocity stacks are a necessity on throttle bodys? Think I am not getting enough air because of the distance between the top of the stack and the air filter top. Seems to flatten out above 3500 and have changed everything but that. Thinking about taking them off and running it to see if it band aids the issue. If they are essential then I could resort to getting taller filters. Tried leaning and richening the A/F, messing with timing, changing heads, exhaust, cam, cam timing, went from dual carb to dual TB EFI, electronic dizzy to crank trigger, different valve lashes and nothing has seemed to really help the problem.
gearheadgreg
Posts: 298
Joined: Fri Mar 08, 2013 5:25 pm

Re: Velocity stacks

Post by gearheadgreg »

If you have less than 1/4" clearance between the air filter lid and your stacks, it is certainly restricting flow. It's super easy to take them off - try it and see if there are any changes. Stacks are always better than not, in terms of airflow, so if they are too close to the lid, get shorter ones!
Dealer for Alloy Wheels & Period H4s and Fog/Driving Lights

http://www.greggearhead.com
User avatar
raul arrese
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:51 am

Re: Velocity stacks

Post by raul arrese »

Run it with no air filter and see if it makes a difference .
User avatar
Tony Z
Posts: 1244
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2000 12:01 am

Re: Velocity stacks

Post by Tony Z »

If I remember correctly, you want to have the same height above the stacks as the stacks are wide.
On my 48IDFs I have 100mm air filters giving me approx 45mm between stack and lid. I am not 100% sure this is high enough, but it works for me for now
stacks increase the efficiency of the throttle body
hemicat
Posts: 167
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 6:24 pm

Re: Velocity stacks

Post by hemicat »

Finally got around to getting my trailing arms clearanced for my shocks and getting it out on the road again. Took the stacks off and hit the rev limiter in third and was still pulling hard. Guess now I will need to look into taller filters.
User avatar
RHough
Posts: 274
Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 10:52 am

Re: Velocity stacks

Post by RHough »

Tony Z wrote:If I remember correctly, you want to have the same height above the stacks as the stacks are wide.
On my 48IDFs I have 100mm air filters giving me approx 45mm between stack and lid. I am not 100% sure this is high enough, but it works for me for now
stacks increase the efficiency of the throttle body
Height = stack diameter is more than you need. Can't hurt though. Height = 50% is plenty.

To avoid restricting the intake you need to space the top of the filter far enough away from the intake so the area is not reduced. The intake area is Pi (approx 3.14) times the radius squared: Pi r^2 = Area

The intake area between the intake and the top of the filter can be figured as a cylinder with the same diameter as the intake and height equal to the distance between the intake and the filter top. The surface area of a cylinder is Circumference times Height or Pi D x H = Area

If you have a 50mm diameter velocity stack entry and the filter top is 50mm away the numbers look like this:

Intake Area is 3.14 x 25^2 or about 2000 sq mm
Available area for intake is 3.14 x 50 x 50 or about 7850 sq mm

The available area is almost 4 times what the intake would have if the filter top was not there ... no restriction due to area.

It works out that about 25% above the diameter of the intake is all you need to feed the intake. No real point in building a filter taller than 50% of intake diameter.

Cheers,
Randy
Post Reply