184HP and 187 TQ from a 2270!
-
- Posts: 20132
- Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2000 12:01 am
184HP and 187 TQ from a 2270!
Yep...Today I dynoed the engine for my 550 Spyder and once again have broken the HP barrier for a pump gas 2270!
184.5HP @ 5,500 RPM and 187 LB/Ft of torque at 4,500 RPM. Peak torque was moved up with a camshaft change that i did to compliment the 1200 pound character it will be installed into. This change moved the peak torque up 1,000 RPM from the Hot Vws engine- exactly what I wanted and all while keeping the peak HP at a lower RPM (less than 6K)
I built the engine just exactly as the 2270 "Type 4 Torquer" that we did for Hot VWs. The only thing that changed was Len's new valve job with his new seat and guide machine and one small change with the cam (only on the exhaust duration and exhaust L/C). The same default settings were used on the dyno as the final numbers were taken with from the Hot VWs engine, 140 main and 30 degrees. The carbs were set up exactly the same as the Hot VWs engine, off the shelf Webers!
The engine has 9.55:1 CR, LE 200 heads and a 9500-B camshaft. No trick assembly at all! The best thing is the engine is all done by 6,000 RPM as peak HP is at 5,500!
I assembld the engine just as a customer would assemble this engine kit, with out of the box tuning the engine broke 180HP and 184 on torque!
Gimme 6 months and this will be a 200Hp combination, all on pump gas @ 9:1. I have found the key!
184.5HP @ 5,500 RPM and 187 LB/Ft of torque at 4,500 RPM. Peak torque was moved up with a camshaft change that i did to compliment the 1200 pound character it will be installed into. This change moved the peak torque up 1,000 RPM from the Hot Vws engine- exactly what I wanted and all while keeping the peak HP at a lower RPM (less than 6K)
I built the engine just exactly as the 2270 "Type 4 Torquer" that we did for Hot VWs. The only thing that changed was Len's new valve job with his new seat and guide machine and one small change with the cam (only on the exhaust duration and exhaust L/C). The same default settings were used on the dyno as the final numbers were taken with from the Hot VWs engine, 140 main and 30 degrees. The carbs were set up exactly the same as the Hot VWs engine, off the shelf Webers!
The engine has 9.55:1 CR, LE 200 heads and a 9500-B camshaft. No trick assembly at all! The best thing is the engine is all done by 6,000 RPM as peak HP is at 5,500!
I assembld the engine just as a customer would assemble this engine kit, with out of the box tuning the engine broke 180HP and 184 on torque!
Gimme 6 months and this will be a 200Hp combination, all on pump gas @ 9:1. I have found the key!
-
- Posts: 299
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 6:55 pm
-
- Posts: 20132
- Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2000 12:01 am
I don't know just yet.. This was the first time that I have been able to apply it directly with the same combo.
I just ordered 7 camshafts all with a few different characteristics, all based on the 9500 grind master. I plan on swapping these back/back/back and seeing what they do. It'll be a tear down marathon but I believe that one of those cams holds the 200HP mark!
BTW- these changes would not make this engine any less reliable than the engine I drove cross country..
Oil temps never went over 210 and it was 125F in the dyno cell! head temps never went over 325!
I just ordered 7 camshafts all with a few different characteristics, all based on the 9500 grind master. I plan on swapping these back/back/back and seeing what they do. It'll be a tear down marathon but I believe that one of those cams holds the 200HP mark!
BTW- these changes would not make this engine any less reliable than the engine I drove cross country..
Oil temps never went over 210 and it was 125F in the dyno cell! head temps never went over 325!
-
- Posts: 20132
- Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2000 12:01 am
- Ephry73
- Posts: 3369
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2001 12:01 am
-
- Posts: 20132
- Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2000 12:01 am
- iamstumper
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 2:55 pm
<--- Wonders how this will affect his 2316 build and if he'll be wishing for a 2270 in the end ....
This is reminding me of my watching PC hardware changes. Soon as you commit to getting a new piece of hardware, a new one comes out the next month making you slap your head and asking yourself, why didn't I just wait?!
Not sure if I should laugh, grimmace or what ... so I'll go with the slow laugh with a gulp at the end
edit:
Meant to add that I love where Jake says that these engines are making its power.
For me, having had a car that didn't feel right unless you were at 7k 9k in the rpm range ... well, in an everyday driven car, it feels completely wasted and had me looking forward to changing cars.
This is reminding me of my watching PC hardware changes. Soon as you commit to getting a new piece of hardware, a new one comes out the next month making you slap your head and asking yourself, why didn't I just wait?!
Not sure if I should laugh, grimmace or what ... so I'll go with the slow laugh with a gulp at the end
edit:
Meant to add that I love where Jake says that these engines are making its power.
For me, having had a car that didn't feel right unless you were at 7k 9k in the rpm range ... well, in an everyday driven car, it feels completely wasted and had me looking forward to changing cars.
-
- Posts: 20132
- Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2000 12:01 am
Here is the graph! As you will note the torque on this one is not as flat as my signature generally creates, but with a 1200 pound application I was more concerned with great acceleration and a broad usable powerband.
This is one sick beast, it's hard to believe that last time I used that cam a few years ago the same displacement engine with roughly the same CR made just over 150HP!
(BTW- The BSFC dip was my fault, I inverted two numbers when I imported the numbers from the fuel flowrator into the spreadsheet and now I'm too lazy to re-do it all as I just noticed I took the screen shot before I caught the mistake. The real BSFC numbers were 51 @ 4500 and 53 @ 5,000 )
This is one sick beast, it's hard to believe that last time I used that cam a few years ago the same displacement engine with roughly the same CR made just over 150HP!
(BTW- The BSFC dip was my fault, I inverted two numbers when I imported the numbers from the fuel flowrator into the spreadsheet and now I'm too lazy to re-do it all as I just noticed I took the screen shot before I caught the mistake. The real BSFC numbers were 51 @ 4500 and 53 @ 5,000 )
- Plastermaster
- Posts: 2762
- Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2001 12:01 am
-
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 6:22 pm
-
- Posts: 20132
- Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2000 12:01 am
-
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 6:22 pm
- Wally
- Posts: 4563
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 12:01 am
Very 'fun' reading Jake. Really enjoying your online R&D progress!MASSIVE TYPE IV wrote:The key is very weird.. It's the camshaft (as always with the TIV) but this one is very non conventional..
Not only is it split duration, it's also split lift and on split lobe centers!
Would that be less lobe center on the exhaust perhaps?
Tnx,
Walter
T4T: 2,4ltr Type 4 Turbo engine, 10.58 1/4 mi
www.apfelbeck.nl
"Mine isn't turbo'd to make a slow engine fast, but to make a fast engine insane" - Chip Birks
www.apfelbeck.nl
"Mine isn't turbo'd to make a slow engine fast, but to make a fast engine insane" - Chip Birks
-
- Posts: 20132
- Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2000 12:01 am