Super Quite Aircooled!! Is It Possible?

General tips/tricks/tools that could be utilized on any platform.
User avatar
supaninja
Posts: 1658
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 12:48 pm

Re: Super Quite Aircooled!! Is It Possible?

Post by supaninja »

Chromoly push rods with zero lash made my engine a bit quiter.
Last edited by supaninja on Tue Jul 19, 2011 8:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
'65 notch w/ a squirted type 4
http://supaninjanick.wordpress.com/
'68 "Zombie Response Vehicle" Westy
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=140387
Steve Arndt
Posts: 7404
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2001 12:01 am

Re: Super Quite Aircooled!! Is It Possible?

Post by Steve Arndt »

The golden ratio is Phi, which lots of folks shoot for.
1.75:1 works best over all according to the smart people that I believe. :)
s
User avatar
Astromic
Posts: 130
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 5:43 pm

Re: Re:

Post by Astromic »

Marc wrote:
Astromic wrote:...i found here in this site that longer rods makes the engine overall sound quiter...
http://www.popularhotrodding.com/tech/0 ... amper.html...
While that might be true in some cases, it wouldn't be helpful on a stock VW engine. With a stock 5.394" rod and 69mm stroke, the VW has a rod ratio of nearly 2:1 (most V8 builders would give up a nut for that, they're usually dealing with too-low rod ratios) and that's approaching the maximum practical ratio for a street engine. Longer rods cause the piston travel to slow approaching and departing TDC, giving the piston time to "flutter" under light loads.
I once had a race engine with a 2.1:1 rod ratio...it was great at high RPM, but below ~1500 it rattled like a diesel.
Steve Arndt wrote:The golden ratio is Phi, which lots of folks shoot for.
1.75:1 works best over all according to the smart people that I believe. :)
s
Talking about the ratios, it's also known that the 1:1 or the "square ratio" will be relatively efficient, but louder.. anyway, you're all right, keeping the ideal configuration is substantial, thus isolating the noise is safer than reducing it from the source..
Unfortunately we will never have the best of both sides. i guess that's why they calls us bug-heads

Mike
User avatar
Clatter
Posts: 2034
Joined: Sun Apr 28, 2002 1:01 am

Re: Super Quite Aircooled!! Is It Possible?

Post by Clatter »

On the highway, it's ALL about intake noise...

Ever see the airfilters on a 356?
They have a snorkle like your mom's Oldsmobile had - for the same reason.

There's those Germanlook carbon fiber airboxes with dual-snorkle.
I was planning on trying to fit two oil-bath filters side-by-side on my Type 4 in type 3.

Intake noise is everything on the highway.
Wait, i said that twice... :D
Speedier than a Fasting Bullet!

Beginners' how-to Type 4 build thread ---> http://shoptalkforums.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=145853
User avatar
Clatter
Posts: 2034
Joined: Sun Apr 28, 2002 1:01 am

Re: Super Quite Aircooled!! Is It Possible?

Post by Clatter »

Dynamat and the like is heavy...
Speedier than a Fasting Bullet!

Beginners' how-to Type 4 build thread ---> http://shoptalkforums.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=145853
User avatar
fusername
Posts: 6806
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 11:26 am

Re: Super Quite Aircooled!! Is It Possible?

Post by fusername »

i can vouch for intake noise, the difference between FI and carbs, and then the difference when i whent from a 2.0 w/ bus heads to a 2.0 with 914 heads and the big valves, could hear it quite easily. suuuuuuuuuuck
give a man a watch and he'll allways know what time it is. give him two and he can never be sure again.

Things are rarely just crazy enough to work, but they're frequently just crazy enough to fail hilariously.
User avatar
dunegoon
Posts: 253
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2001 12:01 am

Re: Super Quite Aircooled!! Is It Possible?

Post by dunegoon »

Hydraulic lifters. Plus add urethane plugs between the head fins like is commonly done with air-cooled motorcycles. Be sure the lower air tin is in place (look into using the vanagon lower tin that is double wall). Be sure excess rocker arm side clearance is eliminated.
Post Reply