1600 turbo build thread

With Turbo and Super charging you can create massive horsepower with vw motors.
User avatar
buguy
Posts: 6209
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 8:53 pm

Re: 1600 turbo build thread

Post by buguy »

Chip Birks wrote: Sun Jun 17, 2018 11:25 am I'd be real hesitant about reusing a 40 year old head, without spending some cash and having a proper valve job done. Unfortunately, if you have a reputable shop do the work, you'll be 300-400 into your free bone stock heads. Or spend a couple hundred more and have a very nice head, with modern port and chamber design, with the ability to cool way better than that old thing.
Makes sense. I figured it would be as good as what I pulled off of it that I would still be running of it hadn't had the crack.
User avatar
buguy
Posts: 6209
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 8:53 pm

Re: 1600 turbo build thread

Post by buguy »

theKbStockpiler wrote: Sun Jun 17, 2018 12:34 pm There were different ways to strengthen the heads in that area with the 3 raised parts being one of them. VW's stock chambers are a simple wedge head with more squish and also more valve shrouding.
I thought maybe they were to keep the barrel spaced out.
User avatar
buguy
Posts: 6209
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 8:53 pm

Re: 1600 turbo build thread

Post by buguy »

Now that's the way to put an engine in! Just grab it and plunk it in from the top!
Image
User avatar
theKbStockpiler
Posts: 596
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 10:25 am

Re: 1600 turbo build thread

Post by theKbStockpiler »

Some of the German heads have a square around the circumference of the chamber. I have never specifically read of why the hell they do.
Super beetle with attitude
User avatar
buguy
Posts: 6209
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 8:53 pm

Re: 1600 turbo build thread

Post by buguy »

Who knows. I guess they knew what they were doing.
User avatar
petew
Posts: 3920
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 4:05 pm

Re: 1600 turbo build thread

Post by petew »

On the qu of what size pots... I'd go bigger if I were you. I wish I'd gone bigger now. Quicker spool at lower revs.
User avatar
buguy
Posts: 6209
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 8:53 pm

Re: 1600 turbo build thread

Post by buguy »

Well I have 94mm p&c on the way. Not sure I will use them, but they will be here!
Should I buy straight cut or helical cam gears? I see straight cut take thrust load off and take less hp to run, but are noisy.
User avatar
petew
Posts: 3920
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 4:05 pm

Re: 1600 turbo build thread

Post by petew »

Helical. Straight cut on the street are nasty. Besides, if you need more HP, just wind up the boost. ;)
User avatar
Chip Birks
Posts: 4006
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 5:59 pm

Re: 1600 turbo build thread

Post by Chip Birks »

If you aren't running big lift or high spring pressure, stick with helical. I can't even here my straight cuts over everything else making noise with my car. Never been a problem for me. I measured the opening on those Panchitos at 1.354". A little bigger than your 1.25 ID pipe. But it wouldn't be a big deal. Just port the flanges a little so the transition is smooth. You aren't looking for crazy high volume flow, you just want to get it to the turbo with some velocity behind it.
User avatar
buguy
Posts: 6209
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 8:53 pm

Re: 1600 turbo build thread

Post by buguy »

Awesome. Thanks guys!
User avatar
buguy
Posts: 6209
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 8:53 pm

Re: 1600 turbo build thread

Post by buguy »

Damn. Ordered my p&c Saturday night and they made it to my house before I did today! From Canada! Cip1
User avatar
buguy
Posts: 6209
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 8:53 pm

Re: 1600 turbo build thread

Post by buguy »

Brought the new p&c to work so the guy can measure them. Or even better show me how to measure then correctly. Hoping they don't need work. Going to check the rings too. I've been reading some of the AA rings don't spring back when spread.
Image
User avatar
buguy
Posts: 6209
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 8:53 pm

Re: 1600 turbo build thread

Post by buguy »

Well the piston gap looks ok.
.0027 on top
.0030 on bottom
Ring gap on the other hand is tight.
.0012"
Not sure what minimum is yet for a turbo but certainly not that tight.
User avatar
Chip Birks
Posts: 4006
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 5:59 pm

Re: 1600 turbo build thread

Post by Chip Birks »

Ring gap is .0012? Holy cow! I just opened mine to .023! A little on the big side, but I also plan to run a ton of boost.
User avatar
buguy
Posts: 6209
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 8:53 pm

Re: 1600 turbo build thread

Post by buguy »

Yeah and they actually tighten up toward the top of the cylinder. I saw more like 0009 at the tops of the cylinders. I'm taking the ring gapper home with me for the weekend. Not sure how far I want to open them up yet. I was thinking somewhere around 0014-0016
My guy said he usually multiplies 5 times the bore size to get the ring gap. So I'm at 3.704" so times 5 is 18.5. Seems a bit wide to me.
Post Reply