Boost vs Compression

With Turbo and Super charging you can create massive horsepower with vw motors.
User avatar
jamesbissland
Posts: 92
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 9:34 pm

Boost vs Compression

Post by jamesbissland »

Hey everyone.

Ive been reading through a lot of posts and write ups about forced induction and there is one thing I just cant get my head around..

How is it when building an N/A motor people say to keep your compression ratio below the 9-9.5:1 for a safe street engine to avoid detonation and over heating; but most of you guys are running not much lower compression ratio, but with huge amounts a boost added on, and pulling massive HP numbers without detonation or overheating?!

I was just looking over a build with a 1915 running 8.5:1 with 17lbs boost dyno'd just over 200HP and running cool as a cucumber

Surely a 8.5:1 compression motor getting 17lbs shoved up it would have higher cylinder pressures than an N/A running 9.5:1 and be much more prone to heat and detonation??

What am i missing??

Thanks so much :)
madmike
Posts: 3146
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 3:11 pm

Re: Boost vs Compression

Post by madmike »

that motor probable had an 'Intercooler' /charge cooler of some sort, that helps with destination :wink: plus good fuel at those higher boost levels
User avatar
Schweg
Posts: 1141
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2018 1:48 pm

Re: Boost vs Compression

Post by Schweg »

Your not missing anything, and this is my very humble understanding. I would say a lot of guys over 14psi of boost are also running EFI giving great control of timing and fueling.

Intake temp plays a large part in the detonation game. So Intercoolers and water injection help there.

Last game changer would be e85

I’m not a VW expert by any stretch but I worked on motorcycles for a bit before changing employment. All that I think VW guys run lower compression to help combat heat but really it’s an ignition and fueling game. I think you could run 9:1 on a turbo motor and be ok. With the above items used.
User avatar
buguy
Posts: 6209
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 8:53 pm

Re: Boost vs Compression

Post by buguy »

I agree. Tune is everything. Low intake temps helps too, but mine still gets up there if keep on it. When it's 97 degrees out it doesn't take much to bump up into the 130 temp range, but I've seen no troubles so far. Also you have to keep in mind, with a turbo, those high compression numbers are only there during boost. On the street you really can't boost that long.
Also 9:1 really isn't that much compression on an N/A engine either. Plenty of guys run more than that. I think it mostly depends on the cam. More overlap bleeds the compression off.
User avatar
Wally
Posts: 4564
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 12:01 am

Re: Boost vs Compression

Post by Wally »

buguy wrote: Thu May 28, 2020 5:18 pm I think it mostly depends on the cam. More overlap bleeds the compression off.
^^ That!

Blown engines also have a better mixture I think.
The rest is just pure magic :wink:
User avatar
buguy
Posts: 6209
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 8:53 pm

Re: Boost vs Compression

Post by buguy »

Yeah! It's just cuz we're cool and stuff!
VdanielW
Posts: 199
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 10:51 am

Re: Boost vs Compression

Post by VdanielW »

The effective compression ratio for an engine with a static compression of 8.5:1 and 17psi of boost is 18.33:1. What does that mean- well, you can brag to that NA guy that you're running 18.33:1 in you bug!
VdanielW
Posts: 199
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 10:51 am

Re: Boost vs Compression

Post by VdanielW »

You've also gotta remember that a boosted car is usually running at low compression levels most of the time.
Post Reply