It's running again.... finally!

Here's the place for info on converting to a Type V motor!
User avatar
Badbugtwo
Posts: 496
Joined: Wed Jul 17, 2002 12:01 am

It's running again.... finally!

Post by Badbugtwo »

After almost three years, I finally put the engine back together. This time I changed out the 86mm flanged crank for a 2.1 waterboxer crank that was offset ground to 2" journals, so it's now 80mm.

Here is some more info....

http://www.badbugracing.com/2008_engine.htm

8)
Last edited by Badbugtwo on Sat Jan 22, 2011 9:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Jeff Rogers
http://www.badbugracing.com
9.35 @ 145
Passatman
Posts: 1038
Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2002 1:01 am

Post by Passatman »

Hi Badbug 11,

I have being to your site and like what i see, but i am particularly interested in the coil per plug setup you will be doing. Which of the stand alone systems will you be using and how do you propose to link the coils to the stand alone management. By the way i am going to use megasquirt on my engine and would also love to use coil per plug setup.
Stephanhipwell
Posts: 94
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 1:59 pm

Post by Stephanhipwell »

beautiful
User avatar
Unkl Ian
Posts: 872
Joined: Sat May 25, 2002 12:01 am

Post by Unkl Ian »

What was the logic for wanting a shorter stroke ?
User avatar
Badbugtwo
Posts: 496
Joined: Wed Jul 17, 2002 12:01 am

Redline Weber

Post by Badbugtwo »

Passatman wrote:Hi Badbug 11,

I have being to your site and like what i see, but i am particularly interested in the coil per plug setup you will be doing. Which of the stand alone systems will you be using and how do you propose to link the coils to the stand alone management. By the way i am going to use megasquirt on my engine and would also love to use coil per plug setup.
Thanks!

I have more info on this page that should answer your questions...

http://www.badbug.com/pantera_efi.htm

8)
Jeff Rogers
http://www.badbugracing.com
9.35 @ 145
User avatar
Badbugtwo
Posts: 496
Joined: Wed Jul 17, 2002 12:01 am

Post by Badbugtwo »

Stephanhipwell wrote:beautiful
Thanks!

8)
Jeff Rogers
http://www.badbugracing.com
9.35 @ 145
User avatar
Badbugtwo
Posts: 496
Joined: Wed Jul 17, 2002 12:01 am

Strength

Post by Badbugtwo »

Unkl Ian wrote:What was the logic for wanting a shorter stroke ?
Well I don't know if I really wanted a shorter crank, but felt I might need one.

My theory is that with a shorter stroke I should have less flex, so it should last longer.

I am also thinking that there is a point of diminishing return when you go longer on the stroke. If I find out that the engine, just really doesn't perform as expected, I can always go bigger again! If/when I can afford it that is!

8)
Jeff Rogers
http://www.badbugracing.com
9.35 @ 145
User avatar
fastvwman
Posts: 222
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 4:36 pm

Re: Strength

Post by fastvwman »

Badbugtwo wrote:
Unkl Ian wrote:What was the logic for wanting a shorter stroke ?
Well I don't know if I really wanted a shorter crank, but felt I might need one.

My theory is that with a shorter stroke I should have less flex, so it should last longer.

I am also thinking that there is a point of diminishing return when you go longer on the stroke. If I find out that the engine, just really doesn't perform as expected, I can always go bigger again! If/when I can afford it that is!

8)

your correct, a smaller stroke will allow more overlap of material between the rod and main journals. notice some super street and pro stocks use 76mm flanged cranks with type 4 mains and 4" pistons.
Post Reply