Page 2 of 2

Re: hitting the back of the valve

Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 11:10 am
by Steve Arndt
Have you tried it?

Re: hitting the back of the valve

Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 11:31 am
by Paul H
Have you ?

Re: hitting the back of the valve

Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 1:23 pm
by woodsbuggy1
I very much appreciate the knowledge and information and positive attitudes shared by members of this forum. I hope that we are able to stay drama free and supportive of other members and their ideas.
As far as injector angle, I can not believe that it is very critical or the CB manifolds and many others would provide rather poor results but this does not seem to be the case at all.
Take Care
Kenric

Re: hitting the back of the valve

Posted: Sat Jan 25, 2014 1:39 am
by volksbugly
MarioVelotta wrote:I want to know how they made twice the torque at 2200 :)
stock cam? Wide lobe separation angle :)

I've noticed this on all the stock type cams looking at all the dyno chart stuff on dub dyno. :D

Re: hitting the back of the valve

Posted: Sat Jan 25, 2014 8:53 am
by MarioVelotta
volksbugly wrote:
MarioVelotta wrote:I want to know how they made twice the torque at 2200 :)
stock cam? Wide lobe separation angle :)

I've noticed this on all the stock type cams looking at all the dyno chart stuff on dub dyno. :D
I am running a stock cam, but 35x32 heads. I believe the Mexican motors where 32x30? Or was that only the German efi... either way, crazy stuff as my car did really well with half the low end torque.