need help - engine 2.0L
Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2002 6:22 am
No ....there is ...as of yet, no substitute for the .015" thick copper diaphram. The suggestion of alternate materials does bring up some interesting thoughts though. Years ago, I tried alternate materials just for fun. I tried rubber....it cannot work.
When rubber vacumes down, it is not stiff enough to have the force to actually push the metal rod/plunger in...because the inner spring and vacume is stronger than the rubber is stiff....make sense? The copper...in comparison acts like a solid...though it has some flex. So when say.. 20" of mercury hits it...it can actually be pulled in...pushing the rod with it. The rubber...or plastics...will begin to move the rod...but then actually start pulling in around the keyhole intermediate plate without moving the rod because the rod spring is stiffer than the rubber.
In order to work, they would need a metal lattice...or scrim to act as "rebar" for the rubber diaphram. I then thought or punching or drilling holes in the copper plate to make a flexible lattice out of it. I added 100 micron (just about .004") latex sheet to the copper. It worked...but was ugly....and latex is not good with heat. I mused...that rubber is rubber (so to speak) which is when I decided to try just repairing the cracked rim with a "cast" on bead or gasket. That works very well depending upon the extent of the crack.
I have recently aquired the ability to "print" very thin coatings of warmed up high temp RTV onto surfaces. I may try this soon and see if I can coat a copper diaphram and then build a gasket edgw without sacrificing sensitivity of flex.
I have found that there is merit to be had in varying the thickness of the copper dfiaphram...say going down to .010"...or up to .020" for different levels of tuning sensitivity...but one thing at a time. Ray
When rubber vacumes down, it is not stiff enough to have the force to actually push the metal rod/plunger in...because the inner spring and vacume is stronger than the rubber is stiff....make sense? The copper...in comparison acts like a solid...though it has some flex. So when say.. 20" of mercury hits it...it can actually be pulled in...pushing the rod with it. The rubber...or plastics...will begin to move the rod...but then actually start pulling in around the keyhole intermediate plate without moving the rod because the rod spring is stiffer than the rubber.
In order to work, they would need a metal lattice...or scrim to act as "rebar" for the rubber diaphram. I then thought or punching or drilling holes in the copper plate to make a flexible lattice out of it. I added 100 micron (just about .004") latex sheet to the copper. It worked...but was ugly....and latex is not good with heat. I mused...that rubber is rubber (so to speak) which is when I decided to try just repairing the cracked rim with a "cast" on bead or gasket. That works very well depending upon the extent of the crack.
I have recently aquired the ability to "print" very thin coatings of warmed up high temp RTV onto surfaces. I may try this soon and see if I can coat a copper diaphram and then build a gasket edgw without sacrificing sensitivity of flex.
I have found that there is merit to be had in varying the thickness of the copper dfiaphram...say going down to .010"...or up to .020" for different levels of tuning sensitivity...but one thing at a time. Ray