Page 3 of 10
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 5:28 am
by max power
Would you still be able to yield the same efficiency/mpg with a turbo plumbed in? A mild one with about 6-8 psi blowing through a plenum setup?
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 6:33 am
by MASSIVE TYPE IV
Not even remotely concerned with that at the present....... Trying to create something that can be built easily and that makes it cheaper...
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 7:09 am
by Plastermaster
Judging by the growth of this thread in a short time, I'd say you have a winner of a project idea!
Ron
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 7:18 am
by MASSIVE TYPE IV
Yep... It is gaining more interest than I thought it would!
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 8:21 am
by sammy49
In France, a gallon of fuel is around 6 dollars.
In the UK, it's even more expensive
So, I definitely think it is a project of great interest for the European market in general.
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 12:54 pm
by the_troupster
Too right!
81.9 Pence a Liter at the moment.
Jim
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 1:09 pm
by Ephry73
Yowsa!
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 1:37 pm
by dstar
Don't worry, we have an Oil Baron in the President's seat and we're catching up as we speak!
It will be $3 a gallon before Bush leaves office....
Don
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 2:30 pm
by 74Shagenwagen
It's just a simple matter of supply and demand. The fast developing countries, like China, are thirsty for fuel. that's what is driving up the cost. Don't blame "W". When you take into consideration the overall cost of living as compared to ten or twenty years ago, we're still not paying that much for gas.
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 2:52 pm
by slowtwitch
74Shagenwagen wrote:It's just a simple matter of supply and demand. The fast developing countries, like China, are thirsty for fuel. that's what is driving up the cost. Don't blame "W". When you take into consideration the overall cost of living as compared to ten or twenty years ago, we're still not paying that much for gas.
Compared to what I made twenty years ago, Then I should be making $200 grand a year now
BTW, This engine is a great idea.
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 3:03 pm
by max power
i have to say, this is a great idea. I want a type 4 for massive torque for loaded down vehicles, long road trips at interstate speed, and the inherent reliability; add great mileage into the mix, and sounds like the perfect engine for a camping vehicle.
my turbo question was more a generalization. are turbos more efficient or would they have to pump more fuel for all the air they cram in there? I'd be laughed out of the forced induction forum if i asked this there; i'm just curious
matt
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 11:57 pm
by Guest
If this engine was available now it would probably be what I was buying. As it is I'm sure I'll be more than happy when my engine kit arrives...Waiting has got to be the hardest part.
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 7:14 am
by MASSIVE TYPE IV
Waiting is the hard part- But we are much faster with kits than ever before and the price is better as well..... The real parts of the kits that are slowing us down are the heads and the balance and prep work simply because it takes a ton of time..
I doubt that I will offer this mileage engine as a kit, tuning will be it's biggest key and chances are that the tuning will be way different than a conventional engine due to super high efficiency and the lack of need for fuel or spark.
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:18 am
by max power
super high efficiency and the lack of need for fuel or spark
In classic Moe Siszlac voice.... "whaaaaa?"
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:22 am
by MASSIVE TYPE IV
Yep... Highly efficient engines need hardly any spark and less fuel to make their power... While gaining more MPG too.