2.1 rod bolt replacement options?
-
- Posts: 2940
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2001 1:01 am
2.1 rod bolt replacement options?
Just wondering what rod bolts you all are using in the 2.1 WBX rods?
Just to recap, the 2.1 rods use stretch bolts which are not intended for reuse.
ARP 5/16"? ARP 2000 3/8"?
Or just get new solid bolts from a normal 1.9/311 rod?
Just to recap, the 2.1 rods use stretch bolts which are not intended for reuse.
ARP 5/16"? ARP 2000 3/8"?
Or just get new solid bolts from a normal 1.9/311 rod?
- Piledriver
- Moderator
- Posts: 22775
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 12:01 am
New German "311" rod bolts/nuts SHOULD be fine for stockinsh uses, and probably OK <150HP.
Func411 bought the other half of teh set of ARP2000 BBC bolts I have put up... Has pics over on the Type4um.
Func411 bought the other half of teh set of ARP2000 BBC bolts I have put up... Has pics over on the Type4um.
Addendum to Newtons first law:
zero vehicles on jackstands, square gets a fresh 090 and 1911, cabby gets a blower.
EZ3.6 Vanagon after that.(mounted, needs everything finished) then Creamsicle.
zero vehicles on jackstands, square gets a fresh 090 and 1911, cabby gets a blower.
EZ3.6 Vanagon after that.(mounted, needs everything finished) then Creamsicle.
-
- Posts: 2940
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2001 1:01 am
-
- Posts: 389
- Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2003 12:01 am
- Piledriver
- Moderator
- Posts: 22775
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 12:01 am
If you do go 3/8", use the part# 235-6002, they are ARP2000 waveloks, and have much smaller 12 pt nuts.
The knurling on the 135-6002s may not line up when you flip the bolts, the Waveloks work fine.
The "right" ARP bolts work fine, but for ~250 HP, you might consider something in a chromemoly rod that already comes with a 3/8" ARP capscrew, I beams are stronger than Hbeams <7K.
The knurling on the 135-6002s may not line up when you flip the bolts, the Waveloks work fine.
The "right" ARP bolts work fine, but for ~250 HP, you might consider something in a chromemoly rod that already comes with a 3/8" ARP capscrew, I beams are stronger than Hbeams <7K.
Last edited by Piledriver on Sat Dec 08, 2007 3:36 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Addendum to Newtons first law:
zero vehicles on jackstands, square gets a fresh 090 and 1911, cabby gets a blower.
EZ3.6 Vanagon after that.(mounted, needs everything finished) then Creamsicle.
zero vehicles on jackstands, square gets a fresh 090 and 1911, cabby gets a blower.
EZ3.6 Vanagon after that.(mounted, needs everything finished) then Creamsicle.
- fastback
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2001 12:01 am
i have used 1.9WBX and stock type1/3 bolts in 3 WBX turbo engines until now ,
rating from 180-260HP(356Nm)
no problems yet.they have seen 6000-6500 many times on street and strip.
I thought the RPM is the biggest problem to stock bolts as the bolts are'nt stressed because of added force downwards on the rods coming from more power/torque??
The most stress is when the rods shifts direction.
Or i'm i wrong?
rating from 180-260HP(356Nm)
no problems yet.they have seen 6000-6500 many times on street and strip.
I thought the RPM is the biggest problem to stock bolts as the bolts are'nt stressed because of added force downwards on the rods coming from more power/torque??
The most stress is when the rods shifts direction.
Or i'm i wrong?
- Piledriver
- Moderator
- Posts: 22775
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 12:01 am
You have a point, but I would have the stock rods magnafluxed at least, and would rather spend a little extra on better rod bolts.fastback wrote:i have used 1.9WBX and stock type1/3 bolts in 3 WBX turbo engines until now ,
rating from 180-260HP(356Nm)
no problems yet.they have seen 6000-6500 many times on street and strip.
I thought the RPM is the biggest problem to stock bolts as the bolts are'nt stressed because of added force downwards on the rods coming from more power/torque??
The most stress is when the rods shifts direction.
Or i'm i wrong?
The 8 ARP "right" ones cost more than 16 of the BBC ones, in a better grade and design.
I lean towards paranoid.
Addendum to Newtons first law:
zero vehicles on jackstands, square gets a fresh 090 and 1911, cabby gets a blower.
EZ3.6 Vanagon after that.(mounted, needs everything finished) then Creamsicle.
zero vehicles on jackstands, square gets a fresh 090 and 1911, cabby gets a blower.
EZ3.6 Vanagon after that.(mounted, needs everything finished) then Creamsicle.
-
- Posts: 389
- Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2003 12:01 am
-
- Posts: 389
- Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2003 12:01 am
- Piledriver
- Moderator
- Posts: 22775
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 12:01 am
RIMCO does up rebuilt "Super Rods" for the T4 and probably T1 with SPS-CARR bolts for (IIRC)~$100/exchange, WBX would likely cost the same, and I'm sure Pauter would be competitive...Steve C wrote:Hi
I cant remember the cost, but the were stock 2.1 WBX rods. They also appeared to be heat treated.
Steve
Addendum to Newtons first law:
zero vehicles on jackstands, square gets a fresh 090 and 1911, cabby gets a blower.
EZ3.6 Vanagon after that.(mounted, needs everything finished) then Creamsicle.
zero vehicles on jackstands, square gets a fresh 090 and 1911, cabby gets a blower.
EZ3.6 Vanagon after that.(mounted, needs everything finished) then Creamsicle.
-
- Posts: 389
- Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2003 12:01 am