1.9 and 2.1 case differences?
- Mr. Electric Wizard
- Posts: 281
- Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2002 12:01 am
1.9 and 2.1 case differences?
I have a 1.9 block that I am wanting to use a a base for a large displacement Oxyboxer.
I am under the impression that the only real difference between a 1.9 case and a 2.1 case is the flywheel bearing size. The 1.9 using a Type 4 bearing and the 2.1 using a .040 Bug bearing.
Are there any other differences.
A 1.9 is what I have now, and I really would like to use it since I already have it.
But I do have a stock 2.1 in my '88 Vanagon (that recently got rebuilt before I bought it), but it might be a while before it craps out.
I'm sure DPR can make me a frankenstein crank that will work.
Is there anything else I am missing?
I am under the impression that the only real difference between a 1.9 case and a 2.1 case is the flywheel bearing size. The 1.9 using a Type 4 bearing and the 2.1 using a .040 Bug bearing.
Are there any other differences.
A 1.9 is what I have now, and I really would like to use it since I already have it.
But I do have a stock 2.1 in my '88 Vanagon (that recently got rebuilt before I bought it), but it might be a while before it craps out.
I'm sure DPR can make me a frankenstein crank that will work.
Is there anything else I am missing?
- Unkl Ian
- Posts: 872
- Joined: Sat May 25, 2002 12:01 am
Re: 1.9 and 2.1 case differences?
I think the 1.9 is first choice, it uses all T4 mains.
- Unkl Ian
- Posts: 872
- Joined: Sat May 25, 2002 12:01 am
Re: 1.9 and 2.1 case differences?
Don't know why VW used completely different bearings for the 2.1 motor.
- Mr. Electric Wizard
- Posts: 281
- Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2002 12:01 am
Re: 1.9 and 2.1 case differences?
Making it a stronger bottom end.
Ok, so what I'm building:
1.9 case
84mm CW Crank
Type 1 rods
101.6 P/C
Turbo, MS fuel and spark.
Ok, so what I'm building:
1.9 case
84mm CW Crank
Type 1 rods
101.6 P/C
Turbo, MS fuel and spark.
- Mr. Electric Wizard
- Posts: 281
- Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2002 12:01 am
Re: 1.9 and 2.1 case differences?
Based on the stroke I'm wanting I think a 2.1 will work much better.
At least it will make it possible.
The top of the case would be getting super thin with that large of a crank in there I suppose.
At least it will make it possible.
The top of the case would be getting super thin with that large of a crank in there I suppose.
- Unkl Ian
- Posts: 872
- Joined: Sat May 25, 2002 12:01 am
Re: 1.9 and 2.1 case differences?
I've read the top of the case has more room than a T1, so it will handle a large stroke.
- Unkl Ian
- Posts: 872
- Joined: Sat May 25, 2002 12:01 am
Re: 1.9 and 2.1 case differences?
I've seen some 2.1 cases in the classifieds on Samba.
- fastback
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2001 12:01 am
Re: 1.9 and 2.1 case differences?
U get the 1,9 in both early style bearings and late style bearings.
the early does not have the "B" in the partnumber on the sump.
025 *** *** B
the early does not have the "B" in the partnumber on the sump.
025 *** *** B
- Unkl Ian
- Posts: 872
- Joined: Sat May 25, 2002 12:01 am
Re: 1.9 and 2.1 case differences?
Late 1.9 bearings are the same as 2.1 ?
- fusername
- Posts: 6806
- Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 11:26 am
Re: 1.9 and 2.1 case differences?
I thought 1.9 used all BUG bearings, not T4 bearings, except for a special flywheel bearing... I have tons of 1.9 mains with no use for them, if they fit t4 i would use em, but I thought that was incorrect.
give a man a watch and he'll allways know what time it is. give him two and he can never be sure again.
Things are rarely just crazy enough to work, but they're frequently just crazy enough to fail hilariously.
Things are rarely just crazy enough to work, but they're frequently just crazy enough to fail hilariously.
- Unkl Ian
- Posts: 872
- Joined: Sat May 25, 2002 12:01 am
Re: 1.9 and 2.1 case differences?
Mr. Electric Wizard wrote: 1.9 case
84mm CW Crank
Type 1 rods
101.6 P/C
Turbo, MS fuel and spark.
Air or water cooled ?
- fastback
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2001 12:01 am
Re: 1.9 and 2.1 case differences?
i have heard that using vw journals and 84mm stroke u can run into clearance problem in the case.
but this was not pauter rod's which are beefier in the big end than stock rods
but this was not pauter rod's which are beefier in the big end than stock rods
-
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2002 12:01 am
Re: 1.9 and 2.1 case differences?
The early 1.9 cases (up to 12/85) uses bug style bearings and one piece thrust bearing they also does not have the front valve drilled.
Later from 1/86-on use chevy style bearings with 3-piece thrust bearing 1.9 & 2.1 same cases.You can use a 80mm crank w/o any clearance required in a wbx case.The very very late cases has a diagonal support rib in the alternator mounting plate area.
Later from 1/86-on use chevy style bearings with 3-piece thrust bearing 1.9 & 2.1 same cases.You can use a 80mm crank w/o any clearance required in a wbx case.The very very late cases has a diagonal support rib in the alternator mounting plate area.
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 12:14 am
Re: 1.9 and 2.1 case differences?
Hey Jim,Jim Andritsakos wrote:The early 1.9 cases (up to 12/85) uses bug style bearings and one piece thrust bearing they also does not have the front valve drilled.
Later from 1/86-on use chevy style bearings with 3-piece thrust bearing 1.9 & 2.1 same cases.You can use a 80mm crank w/o any clearance required in a wbx case.The very very late cases has a diagonal support rib in the alternator mounting plate area.
I'm starting a oxy build here in Crete and might need some parts. Pm if you want to chat/help out w/ sourcing some parts...
thanx,
nick