
Welcome to StF, the best forum on the planet for ACVW discussions.
Not everyone here comes across as an opinionated A-hole, but it's something I happen to specialize in. So if any of the following should offend you, please don't hold it against the whole group. I've got big shoulders and can take the blame all by m'self. Believe it or don't, I have your best interests at heart.
Now that the pleasantries and disclaimers are out of the way, here we go:
Swingaxle, rear-engine? A friggin' disaster if you ask me. Needs at least 100lbs of lead up front just to control unintended wheelstands with a
stock engine - the
last thing it needs is more power...and as for handling it's a death-wish come true (good that you have experience, you'll need it).
The horrid suspension geometry inherent in the swingaxle design cannot be cured by spring or control-arm changes. The rear roll center is at the pinion centerline and always will be, no matter what modifications you make. You'd be better off with NO rear suspension. If you value your life at all, at minimum you'll need to install limiting straps to prevent the rear from going into positive camber and set the initial ride height for 1-1½° negative camber. By raising it, you've forced it positive and made matters worse - it's closer to the dreaded "swingaxle-tuck" (see diagram below) from the get-go.
Even stock IRS ("4-joint") would be better; personally I think a DeDion arrangement works best on a trike, if you can pull it off without too much unsprung weight - but that too requires an IRS trans.
If you haven't yet heard any of this from "Britain's best", they must have it in for you. Have you been sleeping with their wives?
Cheers!
