2270 Testing
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2002 7:05 pm
Ok Guys:
Had a full day of testing a torque version of our 2270. This engine is built for a 181 and will never ever rev beyond 5K. I was definately not interested in what HP it made, torque is what we are trying to make with this one, and as low down as possible.
This combo has shroter rods than my STD 2270, as well as my 209 cam which is stll split duration, and has the same duration on the exhaust, as my normal cam has on the intake. The combo is working out great and made a best of 136 lb/ft of torque @4000 RPM, and a whopping 126 lb/ft @ 2000 RPM.
The HP numbers have a nice climb and peak @ 5000 RPM @ 119.7 not bad for a non revving engine. I took it to 6 K once, but could tell that it was not liking it and it fell on its face after 5 K..
We popped in A Mallory cent unit from John once again, and started playing with advance curves. In the beginning this engine did not like the Mallory at all, as we had it set up last on a TI engine. after 3-4 spring changes we found the pink and grey to work out great.
From the very beginning we had a problem burning the fuel down low, it was rich as hell until 3K RPM, when the fuel numbers dropped. I limited full advance to 22 degrees, with the kit supplied by John and upped the initial advance from 7-10 degrees, this still kept us at our optimized full advance reading of 32 degrees.
Let me tell ya, it came to life, and burned all that excess fuel, completely and had a totally flat fuel curve as well as torque curve. The HP and torque did not change, just efficiency...This is why I really like the Mallory, it is made to do exactly what you need it to do.
The next test since we had made max power from the spring combos was to pull off the fan belt, to see how much it pulled in comparison to the 911 unit. This engine was outfitted with a DTM, and had all std T I cooling components. It kept the engine very cool and it never got over 400 degrees, and I tried to get it hotter....It seems to cool this size engine just as well as the 911 arrangement!!
we popped off the belt and our peak torque was still made @ 4K, but it went from 136.9 to 147.9...while peak HP was still at 5K, but went from 119 to 127!!
All in all in my tests so far it looks like the 911 qnd a DTM pull about the same on a TIV engine, what we need to do is do the test on the same engine (which would be tough) regardless it still pulls about 8-10HP no matter how you cut it..
What these test proved to me is that:
(1) The DTM works (I already knew that) and that it will cool an engine of the same size nearly as good as a 911.
(2) That the Mallory distributor still bolted on 10% more power over anything from the VW line up, including an 050,009 and 205 VAC..
Tomorrow I will install the Vac Mallory with the same spring settings and work for the best full advance setting....This stuff is addicting, but VERY time consuming..
------------------
Jake Raby
Raby's Aircooled Technology
www.aircooledtechnology.com
Had a full day of testing a torque version of our 2270. This engine is built for a 181 and will never ever rev beyond 5K. I was definately not interested in what HP it made, torque is what we are trying to make with this one, and as low down as possible.
This combo has shroter rods than my STD 2270, as well as my 209 cam which is stll split duration, and has the same duration on the exhaust, as my normal cam has on the intake. The combo is working out great and made a best of 136 lb/ft of torque @4000 RPM, and a whopping 126 lb/ft @ 2000 RPM.
The HP numbers have a nice climb and peak @ 5000 RPM @ 119.7 not bad for a non revving engine. I took it to 6 K once, but could tell that it was not liking it and it fell on its face after 5 K..
We popped in A Mallory cent unit from John once again, and started playing with advance curves. In the beginning this engine did not like the Mallory at all, as we had it set up last on a TI engine. after 3-4 spring changes we found the pink and grey to work out great.
From the very beginning we had a problem burning the fuel down low, it was rich as hell until 3K RPM, when the fuel numbers dropped. I limited full advance to 22 degrees, with the kit supplied by John and upped the initial advance from 7-10 degrees, this still kept us at our optimized full advance reading of 32 degrees.
Let me tell ya, it came to life, and burned all that excess fuel, completely and had a totally flat fuel curve as well as torque curve. The HP and torque did not change, just efficiency...This is why I really like the Mallory, it is made to do exactly what you need it to do.
The next test since we had made max power from the spring combos was to pull off the fan belt, to see how much it pulled in comparison to the 911 unit. This engine was outfitted with a DTM, and had all std T I cooling components. It kept the engine very cool and it never got over 400 degrees, and I tried to get it hotter....It seems to cool this size engine just as well as the 911 arrangement!!
we popped off the belt and our peak torque was still made @ 4K, but it went from 136.9 to 147.9...while peak HP was still at 5K, but went from 119 to 127!!
All in all in my tests so far it looks like the 911 qnd a DTM pull about the same on a TIV engine, what we need to do is do the test on the same engine (which would be tough) regardless it still pulls about 8-10HP no matter how you cut it..
What these test proved to me is that:
(1) The DTM works (I already knew that) and that it will cool an engine of the same size nearly as good as a 911.
(2) That the Mallory distributor still bolted on 10% more power over anything from the VW line up, including an 050,009 and 205 VAC..
Tomorrow I will install the Vac Mallory with the same spring settings and work for the best full advance setting....This stuff is addicting, but VERY time consuming..
------------------
Jake Raby
Raby's Aircooled Technology
www.aircooledtechnology.com