oxyboxer?

Are you one of those confused people who can't make up their mind?
Tristessa
Posts: 473
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2000 12:01 am

oxyboxer?

Post by Tristessa »

Does anyone know more about the oxyboxer conversion, as seen at http://www.clubvw.org.au/oxyboxer.htm ?? The idea is rather intriguing, but what little information I've found is all on that one page.

TIA
User avatar
Steve C
Posts: 1143
Joined: Sun May 14, 2000 12:01 am

oxyboxer?

Post by Steve C »

Hi
I will add some more details to the page soon.
Regards Steve C
Rmcelroy
Posts: 157
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 12:01 am

oxyboxer?

Post by Rmcelroy »

This looks pretty cool-what advantages would this have over just doing a nice T4?
User avatar
Steve C
Posts: 1143
Joined: Sun May 14, 2000 12:01 am

oxyboxer?

Post by Steve C »

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Rmcelroy:
<B>This looks pretty cool-what advantages would this have over just doing a nice T4?

</B><HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Hi
I dont want to get ito a debate about T1 V T4 but just regard the oxyboxer conversion as stronger case option for a T1. If you have existing T1 stuff it might be a good way to go. You can swing an 86 crank in a 2.1 case. The T4 if you are staring from scratch would be more cost effective. There was a lenghty debate on this in the Type 4 forum, do a search and check it out.

Regards Steve C
Rmcelroy
Posts: 157
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 12:01 am

oxyboxer?

Post by Rmcelroy »

[/b][/QUOTE]
Hi
I dont want to get ito a debate about T1 V T4 but just regard the oxyboxer conversion as stronger case option for a T1. If you have existing T1 stuff it might be a good way to go. You can swing an 86 crank in a 2.1 case. The T4 if you are staring from scratch would be more cost effective. There was a lenghty debate on this in the Type 4 forum, do a search and check it out.
Regards Steve C[/B][/QUOTE]

No debate needed-I was just looking for information just like that. Reusing your T1 parts is a good enough reason.
Steve Arndt
Posts: 7420
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2001 12:01 am

oxyboxer?

Post by Steve Arndt »

Along the same lines. . .
I am going to mill the jackets off a spare wasser block. My plan is to use the wasser heads, wasser pistons, but Cima 94 cylinders. I will figure out how to flow the coolant through the heads ONLY (obviously blocking off the ports formerly leading into the cylinder waterjacket area). The cool thing I'm thinking about is using the wasser pistons to retain the proper combustion chamber shape, but I can then use JayCee long 94mm barrels to fit 5.7" rods, and a ultra long through crank in the case easily.

The other option is to use aircooled heads and change the stud patter (if you want enough fins. Autocraft pro heads don't count! [they are the only head that bolts up]). Can someone sell me the offset studs used in the article? Steve C.? Does Hellbug sell these?

Demello cranks can take a regular wasser crank, counterweight it, and offset grind to 82 stroke w/ chevy journals for $500.

Steve
User avatar
Steve C
Posts: 1143
Joined: Sun May 14, 2000 12:01 am

oxyboxer?

Post by Steve C »

Hi
There is a few ways to approach the head stud issue. One way that works is to bore the standard hole out to 5/8 th. Insert a 5/8th stud and mill it flat, then redrill the stud to 8 mm so that you get the type 1 pattern back again, then just use type 1 studs. I have seen another guy have new studs centreless ground.
Steve, why not just use the watercooled barrles and be done with it?
Regards Steve C
Steve Arndt
Posts: 7420
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2001 12:01 am

oxyboxer?

Post by Steve Arndt »

I suppose water cooling the cylinders as original would work, I just wanted to avoid all those head gasket problems. All the Vanagons here need resealing all the time because the heads are corroding away.

What about welding up the hole then drilling and tapping?
User avatar
Steve C
Posts: 1143
Joined: Sun May 14, 2000 12:01 am

oxyboxer?

Post by Steve C »

Hi
Welding would work but I think redrilling a stud would be much neater. If you use factory coolant and distilled water you will not have headgasket problems.
Regards Steve C
Tristessa
Posts: 473
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2000 12:01 am

oxyboxer?

Post by Tristessa »

For clarification, is the WBX stud pattern the same as T4, or is it unique? I picked up a 1.9WBX core (corrosion problems), but it's sitting in the back corner of a friend's garage 25 miles away right now..
User avatar
Steve C
Posts: 1143
Joined: Sun May 14, 2000 12:01 am

oxyboxer?

Post by Steve C »

Hi
Im not sure if its the same as a Type 4 but it has a slightly larger pcd than a type 1.
Regards Steve C
graeme86
Posts: 107
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2001 12:01 am

oxyboxer?

Post by graeme86 »

Check this link: http://www.hellbug.com.au/
and contact the proprietor Jeff Unwin.
Steve Arndt
Posts: 7420
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2001 12:01 am

oxyboxer?

Post by Steve Arndt »

wasser has T1 bore spacing and T4 stud spacing.
The center of each bore is the same distance apart as a type 1.
The studs are in the larger T4 pattern.
They did it this way because they did not need to fit in fins on large cylinders so they can be closer together.
User avatar
Steve C
Posts: 1143
Joined: Sun May 14, 2000 12:01 am

oxyboxer?

Post by Steve C »

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by graeme86:
<B>Check this link: http://www.hellbug.com.au/
and contact the proprietor Jeff Unwin.</B><HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Hi Graeme
Hellbug has gone out of business.
Regards Steve C
graeme86
Posts: 107
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2001 12:01 am

oxyboxer?

Post by graeme86 »

Fair dinkum!!
Post Reply