Page 1 of 1
Compression Ratio
Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2002 4:39 pm
by Advokat
I have seen lots and lots of posts about this subject, but there does not seem to be a clear answer.
I am building a 1904 (74 x 90.5) Heads will be dual spring 40 x 32 w/p&p. Carbs. are Dellorto 36's. The cam is a Web 119, stock rockers-1.1:1. Kymco flanged super-header w/a single quietpack.
This is to be a street car that is not going to the drag strip. I wanted some more torque and power, but wanted it to remain very driveable.
The guy doing the heads suggested c/r in the 7.8-8.2 range. (I believe some of this suggestion had something to do with the fact that I am using heater boxes) With all of that said, what do you all think a good number would be with this combo.?
Thanks
[This message has been edited by Advokat (edited 06-26-2002).]
Compression Ratio
Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2002 6:40 pm
by Searoy
I have seen lots and lots of posts about this subject, but there does not seem to be a clear answer.
How true.
Have fun. Sounds fine to me. A little odd doing all that work and spending all that money on 90.5x74 when a 94x78 costs practically the same.
------------------
*** Teach a Man to Fish ***
Darth Searoy
"I tend to lean toward a tighter gap and a
looser skirt....a little slap never hurt." -- Joe of the West
Compression Ratio
Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2002 6:53 pm
by MASSIVE TYPE IV
The reason that there are so many different opinions is because of testing and opinions from the early days...there must be a happy medium of cam/valves/CR and port work to make it all work out......
I'm not gonna post a recommendation here, email me if you want my views, as all it does here is start a war, especially since it defys most people rules.
Compression Ratio
Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2002 9:45 pm
by Gib
Advokat,
Curious. Did you mean 40 x 35.5 valves in the heads or are you going with 40 x 32's? I've heard that they are not to good in any application other than stock because the smaller exhaust valve restricts flow causing tuning and heat problems.
Gib
Compression Ratio
Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2002 3:27 pm
by Advokat
Gib, you read right, 40 x 32. I got these from AJ Simms and he understood my setup and what I wanted. Apparently, this is a very popular configuration for those of us that still need to use heater boxes.
I thought what you did, but AJ advised that there should be no problems.
Compression Ratio
Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2002 4:12 pm
by Gib
Advokat,
Cool, just checking.
Gib
Compression Ratio
Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2002 1:56 pm
by teacherguy
Advocat-
I'm building a similar engine with 34ICT's instead and was wondering about the heads and all. Where can you get them and what are thos heads based off of: 040, 041, etc? Thanks for the info.
[email protected]
Compression Ratio
Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2002 5:08 pm
by Advokat
Teacherguy,
They are AJ Simms heads using an 043 casting. There is a website at
www.lowbugget.com
Good luck
Compression Ratio
Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2002 3:36 pm
by bedlamite
One other question, why dual springs? Do you really plan on reving over 6000RPM with stock rocker arms? Get a good quality set of single springs and your valve train will last much longer.
To answer your original question, I would keep it under 8.5:1 for a street car running pump gas.
Compression Ratio
Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2002 3:52 pm
by Advokat
Well, two things. I am going to use stock rocker arms, but go with solid rocker shafts.
I originally was going to go with the single springs, but AJ threw in the duals for no extra cost. So, I took them.
Thanks.